Frances Tiafoe vs Jakub Mensik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do both players perform on their second serve? Tiafoe has won 46.22% of second serve points over the past six months, slightly trailing behind Mensik, who has won 49.81%.
• When it comes to returning, Mensik has an advantage, having won 46.21% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Tiafoe's 43.69%. How about first serves? Mensik also leads, achieving a 22.77% success rate versus Tiafoe's 22.09%.
• Under pressure moments might favor Tiafoe, as he has saved 59.82% of breakpoints recently compared to Mensik's 55.76%.
• Who has the better overall win record in the past year? Mensik edges this, having won 61.19% of his matches, while Tiafoe has won 53.57%.
• On which surface does each player excel the most? Tiafoe's best surface is Clay with a 63% win rate, whereas Mensik excels on Hard courts with a 70% win rate.
• Analyzing playing levels, Mensik has a stronger win rate in the Masters series at 73.08%, while Tiafoe has been consistent with a 50% win rate on the Main tour.
• Who has faced tougher opponents on average recently? Tiafoe's opponents have had an average rank of 74.04, a bit less challenging compared to Mensik's, with an average rank of 67.16.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Mensik has a slight edge, having won 45% of these sets in the last year, whereas Tiafoe has managed 40%.
• Evaluating break point conversion, Tiafoe leads with a 36.49% success rate, outperforming Mensik's 30.67%.

Editorial Prediction (September 14, 2025, UTC):

As the match approaches, several factors influence predictions regarding who may claim victory. Mensik shows a slight advantage in second serve and return game statistics, indicating his capacity to seize opportunities and disrupt his opponent's rhythm. Despite this, Tiafoe demonstrates resilience, particularly in saving breakpoints, a key component of his in-game strategy.

Tiafoe's consistency and experience on the Main tour play a crucial role, yet Mensik's current momentum, reflected in his notable performance at the Masters series and a higher win percentage, positions him as a formidable opponent. Mensik's competence on hard courts enhances his competitive edge, although Tiafoe remains adaptable across surfaces.

While Tiafoe mastered high-pressure scenarios with superior break point conversion rates, Mensik's efficiency in critical moments, alongside his ability to outperform in deciding sets, contributes to his strategic advantage. Given these elements, Mensik appears to emerge as the likely winner of this encounter.